Note for eudev vs udev
nope. eudev is a fork of udev without any systemd dependencies or whatever. eudev is default choice for virtual/udev . eudev cannot work in systemd environment. so simple user will have both migration (eudev > udev and openrc > systemd). it can be hard and can be descreabed somewhere --Cronolio (talk) 17:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- I understand eudev. My point is that the virtual/udev ebuild describes sys-fs/udev as unnecessary when using systemd. udev is even masked in the systemd profile (see /usr/portage/profiles/targets/systemd/package.mask. Do you still think we need to address this? If not, then please mark this discussion as closed/done. :) Kind regards, --Maffblaster (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Yeah it was my fail. Small
b mean are resolved block.
[uninstall ] sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5 [blocks b ] sys-fs/eudev ("sys-fs/eudev" is blocking sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-6) [blocks b ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5) [blocks b ] sys-apps/systemd ("sys-apps/systemd" is blocking sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5) [blocks b ] sys-fs/eudev ("sys-fs/eudev" is blocking sys-apps/systemd-226-r2)
Consider the following sentence: "Certain applications are heavily dependent on the Gnome software ecosystem and subsequently dependent on systemd."
Gnome should be replaced by GNOME.
Missing Note template
I would add a Note template as follows:
Certain applications are heavily dependent on the GNOME software ecosystem and subsequently dependent on systemd. Readers who are unsure if the GNOME desktop environment will be used can migrate to a systemd profile later.