Handbook Talk:AMD64/Portage/Branches
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using
~~~~
:
A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) : A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 16:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC) :: Your reply ~~~~
Small fixes
- In the sentence "Support requests related to package.unmask and/or package.mask might not be answered." the Path template should be used for the parts in bold.
- Same for "When a package has been masked by the Gentoo developers, yet despite the reason mentioned in the package.mask file"
Fturco (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
"~amd64" missing in examples
The examples shown in Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Branches#Mixing_stable_with_testing should include the ~arch information.--Charles17 (talk) 09:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- I have just reworked the stable and testing sections and believe this request is now resolved. See Special:Diff/1026216/1169681 for the changes. --Maffblaster (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Minor grammar mistake
In the red warning text, I think "a other" should be changed to "another". --Dhirsbrunner (talk) 02:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's in section Testing.
- — Waldo Lemmer 06:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed in Special:Diff/1272592/1298201, thanks!
- --csfore (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Suggested changes
General suggestion: It might be useful to have some brief introductory text explaining the concept of a 'branch' in the context of Portage.
"Stable" section
For less risk of instability or other issues, it's recommended that users should stay on the stable software branch in general, and only allow testing versions of packages on a case-by-case basis - refer to the "Mixing stable with testing" section below.
"Testing" section
Suggest removing the phrase "Hic sunt dracones!" from the Warning, as it seems unnecessary; at the very least, it should be rendered as "Here be dragons", rather than expecting readers to know Latin / Latin phrases.
As noted above, it is recommended that users stay with the stable, more thoroughly tested branch.
and performing a @world update
"Masked packages" section
Gentoo developers mask packages for good reason. Therefore, unmasking a package is generally not supported by Gentoo's support channels, and support requests related to package.unmask and/or package.mask are likely to be ignored or marked as WONTFIX. Please exercise due caution when unmasking packages.
When attempting to install the package, Portage will output a message indicating the package has been masked, together with (usually) the reason why.
Suggest removing the phrase "(poor doggy!)", as it seems unnecessary.
- Thanks! Added in Special:Diff/1298201/1316653
- --csfore (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)