User talk:Ris/Template:Review
From Gentoo Wiki
< User talk:Ris(Redirected from User talk:Kyoreln/Template:Review)
Jump to:navigation
Jump to:search
Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. To create a new discussion, click here. Comments on an existing discussion should be signed using
~~~~
:
A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) : A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 17:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC) :: Your reply ~~~~
Navigate to first
Point of this template?
Gentoo Wiki does not have editors or anyone to "claim" an article. For works in progress, Template:WIP already exists. For to do items, Template:InfoBox todo exists.
If this gets moved to the Template namespace, I'll have to greatly neuter it. --Grknight (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. To be honest, that's some relief: I'm not enjoying trying to get this working xD. Thanks for the heads up before I spent my evening wrestling MediaWiki !! I wouldn't have moved anything to the Template workspace without asking.
- I asked on IRC, but I don't often get an answer (not complaining - I don't know how people manage to survive with all the work they seem to do), so I was just going to try it out. Help:Editing_pages [1] : this is what I've been working from these past weeks, pending feedback. As I've mentioned, I appreciate the corrections: in the absence of whole swaths of edits getting reverted, I'm supposing what I add is probably *passable* :).
- The motivation for this template was that I'm planning on doing edits to a set of articles and I worry that people could translate things that I plan on reworking (sometimes heavily), and I thought it would be a shame to potentially waste good work. I realize now that such a system is probably not needed. I promise I'll read more docs and figure things out, but translation seems foreboding on MediaWiki, I've been putting it off...
- The idea was less to have people "claim" articles than to provide some indication of article quality. The text was not thought out, I just wanted to see if I could get it working technically.
- This is what I asked on IRC:
- "<kyoran> I'm planning on some far reaching edits on quite a few articles over the next few months (!= promising, but I hope to). I want to concentrate on things I see as most important to users (core, meta, portage, openrc, +documentation [more links to docs on web, Wikipedia, man pages...], etc.). I see that recently more translations are coming in and I'm wondering if I should warn people that I plan on modifying some articles (ie a box at bottom of page) ? [It] seems a shame to let people work on translations and then change the source...
- <kyoran> Rather than spreading any effort over many articles as I have been doing, I could concentrate on one or two articles at a time and then flag them as "ready for translation", if what I bring up could indeed be a problem...
- <kyoran> Perhaps at this time, the only page I've been working on that might be somewhere near what I'm hoping to do is this one : wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Man_page (still needs work)"
- I have added writing a reStructuredText wiki with proper, versioned, translation to my list of projects to dream about, since I saw this: weblate.org xD.
- Btw, I think the main thing I've seen discussed on IRC is that people miss you since the servers changed ;).
- ↑ "The number one rule of wiki editing, is to be bold. Dive in and make changes. Other wiki contributors can correct mistakes later, so have confidence, and give it a try!"