Talk:X server
This is a Talk page - please see the documentation about using talk pages. Add newer comments below older ones, sign comments using four tildes (
~~~~), and indent successive comments with colons (:).
Add new sections at the bottom of the page, under a heading (== ==). Please remember to mark sections as "open for discussion" using {{talk|open}}, so they will show up in the list of open discussions.Update
This page is in the process of being updated. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oz (talk • contribs) 22:20, 26 November 2017
- I added a WIP (work in progress) template with your username. Feel free to remove it when you finish updating this article. Fturco (talk) 12:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Explain undo
to Brian Evans (Grknight) - Explain https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=X_server&diff=next&oldid=740524
-- Kreyren (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Kreyren , he did this for the right reason, which was listed in the edit summary: "Revert empty section". You can see this if you know how to view recent changes. As you can see for basically every article that you haven't edited on the wiki, we don't add empty sections for the sake of adding sections. Unless you are going to actually fill in quality, relevant content for the section, please don't add sections. This applies to most of his edits. He's either undoing empty sections, or removing your personal notes from main space articles - which is good. You can keep your personal notes in your user space. Thanks. --Maffblaster (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Matthew Marchese (Maffblaster) , please refer to a https://docs.google.com/document/d/17r4644tcPuruOA0NZiXgZ71iAp2d9QIM_MHbz637SQI/edit i do believe that those edits are hurting end-user experience.
Disagree with removing blank session. Session i've added was meant to be for users to share their issues and solution to be filled. Removing that section you are removing the foundation for more relevant and important info. I'm adding comments since most of gentoo wiki entries is full of missleading and outdated info. If i make a commend and add stub it can be filled by other community member which has proven to be very effective. --Kreyren (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Subsume this article into Xorg article ?
This article and the Xorg article seem to cover basically the same topic. Can this article be subsumed into the Xorg article and replaced with a redirect ?
Along with the guide article, Non_root_Xorg, xorg.conf, and other articles in Category:X.Org, this whole subject already seems very verbose... If there is no objection, I'll get to work in a few weeks.