Category talk:Science
From Gentoo Wiki
Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. In particular, sign comments using
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. In particular, sign comments using
~~~~ and add new discussions at the bottom of the page. New discussions should be made visible with {{Talk|date = 2024-05-20}}.
== Discussion title ==
{{Talk|date = 2024-05-13}}
A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
: A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 11:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:: Another reply [[User:Larry|Larry]] 03:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
:: Your reply ~~~~
| Navigate to first: |
|---|
Category purpose
Talk status
This discussion is still ongoing.
What should and should not belong to this category? What about Matlab and GNU Octave articles? --Lars Hint (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Everything related to science (not limited to just software) when none of narrower categories is applicable. I think the mentioned articles qualify CyberTailor (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Could you give an example of a science-related page that's not about software that's a good fit for the Gentoo wiki?
- If BOINC, Matlab, and GNU Octave were added to Category:Science and Category:Science were added to Category:Software, these pieces of software would be more easily discoverable by users. — Waldo Lemmer 05:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Mainly Category:Meta guides, however other edge cases are possible CyberTailor (talk) 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I think I understand. Maybe we need Category:Science (software) and Category:Science (meta)? Having both kinds of article belong to Category:Science and having that category belong to both Category:Software and Category:Meta would break the hierarchy we currently have (
Wiki Root -> SoftwareandWiki Root -> Software -> Metadon't share pages between them). — Waldo Lemmer 09:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I think I understand. Maybe we need Category:Science (software) and Category:Science (meta)? Having both kinds of article belong to Category:Science and having that category belong to both Category:Software and Category:Meta would break the hierarchy we currently have (
- Mainly Category:Meta guides, however other edge cases are possible CyberTailor (talk) 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- If BOINC, Matlab, and GNU Octave were added to Category:Science and Category:Science were added to Category:Software, these pieces of software would be more easily discoverable by users. — Waldo Lemmer 05:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)