Talk:Repository format/profiles/repo name
From Gentoo Wiki
Note
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. In particular, sign comments using
Before creating a discussion or leaving a comment, please read about using talk pages. In particular, sign comments using
~~~~ and add new discussions at the bottom of the page. New discussions should be made visible with {{Talk|date = 2024-05-17}}.
== Discussion title ==
{{Talk|date = 2024-05-13}}
A comment [[User:Larry|Larry]] 13:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
: A reply [[User:Sally|Sally]] 11:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:: Another reply [[User:Larry|Larry]] 10:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
:: Your reply ~~~~
| Navigate to first: |
|---|
layout.conf vs repo_name
Talk status
This discussion is still ongoing as of July 3, 2016.
How is this better than `metadata/layout.conf` specifying `repo-name` parameter?
Repository_format/metadata/layout.conf#repo-name takes precedence over `profiles/repo_name`. Does it mean `profiles/repo_name` is deprecated and not needed at all anymore?
Overlay/Local_overlay still suggests creating `profiles/repo_name`. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lkraav (talk • contribs) 10:32, July 3, 2016