Future EAPI/New dependency types

This page provides a summary of new dependency types requested for various features.

The types

 * BADEPEND (aka CDEPEND )
 * Build-against dependencies; . It would be used to inject additional DEPEND into a package being built against the package in question.
 * Use case: xorg packages, where e.g. building against libX11 requires header files in xorg-proto. However, libX11 can still be used without xorg-proto installed, so RDEPEND is not really correct. An alternative is to specify xorg-proto in every single ebuild linking against libX11 directly or indirectly.
 * Note: This has also been suggested under the name CDEPEND (for "compile-against depend") previously.


 * FDEPEND
 * Fetch dependencies; . If implemented, it will be used to specify the dependencies necessary for the  phase (e.g. a particular VCS). Thus, the package manager will be required to delay the execution of that phase until all fetch dependencies have been satisfied.
 * Alternative solution: put fetch dependencies in DEPEND, and request  implementation to check whether the tool requirements are satisfied already. Allow the package manager to execute   without satisfying the dependencies and if it fails, re-try when the dependencies are satisfied.


 * IDEPEND
 * Install-time dependencies. Tools required for  phases; useful when binary a package is being installed and thus DEPEND does not fit.


 * LDEPEND
 * Library dependencies. Packages providing a library that is linked to, the first dependency type listed for BSD ports, cf: LIB_DEPENDS, which portage descends from. These would automatically be considered both DEPEND and RDEPEND, but soname changes would be tracked, and this would provide better data for both embedded and normal builds, eg: for.


 * SDEPEND
 * Suggested dependencies; . A way of providing suggestions to install additional packages which can provide additional features to the package in question.


 * TDEPEND
 * Test dependencies; . Additional dependencies needed for the  phase.

Listing of suggested 'longer' names
If we decide to switch to a more meaningful dependency variable names, here are some ideas:


 * BADEPEND -> BUILD_AGAINST_DEPEND
 * BDEPEND -> BUILD_DEPEND
 * FDEPEND -> FETCH_DEPEND
 * HDEPEND -> HOST_DEPEND (HOST_BUILD_DEPEND?)
 * IDEPEND -> INSTALL_DEPEND (PKG_DEPEND?)
 * LDEPEND -> LIB_DEPEND (LINK_DEPEND?)
 * PDEPEND -> POST_DEPEND
 * RDEPEND -> RUN_DEPEND (RUNTIME_DEPEND?)
 * SDEPEND -> SUGGESTED_DEPEND