Talk:Ebuild repository

= Overlay priorities = I know it may seem a little chaotic, but shell variable expansion (or should I say substitution ? I'm not sure if I misuse the two or people around me) is not that easy to describe ;) This magic works on my setup, please test it though. Also, I think this should be documented in the overlay guide, as it's quite an important feature of overlay handling. I'd be glad to help to develop the doc, so developers, just leave note on my  page, if you're interested P.S.: I'm new to wiki-style editting, so excuse me if I didn't follow some guidelines. Smartass 08:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * It might be better to move the priority handling in layman to the Layman article instead, and keep the Overlay article "pure" in its intend. --SwifT 08:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks SwifT for having a look at the article and thanks a lot for the corrections :) Just one remark: I don't fully support your formulation about the portage tree being added into the overlay structure as I believe it does not truly reflect the implementation, the python file reference I added in Overlay treats the portage tree as an overlay like any other, but performs a check whether the overlay that is currently being processed is PORTDIR (line 252 in that file) Smartass 09:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * True, I stand corrected. The code indeed only assigns a priority once and as such, for the portage tree, looks if it is defined in the overlays as well. However, I wouldn't refer to the commit nor the code in the wiki - first of all, the code will change (on my system it is located elsewhere and the line numbers are not correct) and the commit isn't interesting for most users (we would otherwise provide too much data in this article). I'll update the sentence to remove the "as well". --SwifT 09:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Errr, not sure if I expressed myself correctly. What I meant was that your formulation makes it sound like the portage tree is not in the overlay structure which is not true. Yeah, I'm getting beyond pedantic ;D Smartass 09:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok SwifT, I suppose removing the too "under the hood" stuff won't degrade usability of the provided information. And if someone really wants to know why...well, he will have to either ask, or do some research and dive into the code. Sounds reasonable. Cheers :) Smartass 10:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Splitting layman priorities handling
I support this move. Shall I do it, or do you want to do it yourself, SwifT ? Smartass 09:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a wiki, you go ahead ;-) --SwifT 09:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do, you get to pick up the pieces :P Smartass 09:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * done Smartass 10:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Tools section
Maybe it's good idea to add tools section (i.e. with overlint-cli and repoman etc) or just links to articels about them? I can handle this. --Emc (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)