Handbook Talk:Parts/Working/Portage

Bad example
The example given in the Licenses section refers to. Such package is not in Gentoo repository, see https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8000306.html

--Charles17 (talk) 05:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I'll change the reference to google-chrome, since it is in the repository (and probably not leaving as long as Google exists). :) Thanks for reporting! --Maffblaster (talk) 08:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Example still bad. Maffblaster, why you add  ? This exaple not about version. Also "This permits installation of BLABLA versions that have the BLABLA license" is most better. Please review it again. Thanks. --Cronolio (talk) 00:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Then put an example that you like below. Seems like you shouldn't care about this example much. I know I don't. --Maffblaster (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * My version something like:
 * For example, to allow the license for the  package, add the following to :




 * This permits installation google-chrome package, but not permit installation www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins although this package have the same license.


 * --Cronolio (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Works for me. Consider it done. --Maffblaster (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)