User talk:Roger

Suggestions for the hplip wiki page.
Roger I appreciate your participation on the hplip wiki page however I would kindly ask you to be more objective and refrain from using terms like: "the HPLIP code seems to be poorly engineered" "It will make you want to avoid HP printers like the plague, due to broken packages, broken upgrades, and unfixed bugs within HPLIP, as this is the only error you get at most times!" "Pulling in extra, usually not needed dependencies, is another strong sign; those coding the hplip package are just hacking and requiring every package even though they do not use the packages. Or, they're poorly documenting while they're coding. Either way, nothing looks pretty from my user perspective, something a user should not be experiencing!"

I think you don't have the right to adress the hplip developers in such a way. Furthermore such things do not belong into a Wiki. I know the hplip code is not perfect and things could be done better but I try to get along with this.

Also I would like to ask you to not write in first person as I think this does not look good in a Wiki as well.

Most of the problems in the troubleshooting part of the page are from you and are often related to the binary plugin which is not supported. I recommend you to create a separate page about the binary plugin and put this contents there. This said I will remove parts of the page which I think they do not really fit there.